Torrance v. Callenius

369 U.S. 658, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1272
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided May 14, 1962·No. 227, Misc·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart, for the reasons given in their dissent in the Goldlawr case, would deny certiorari. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Torrance v. Callenius, 369 U.S. 658, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1272 (1962).

369 U.S. 658 (Torrance v. Callenius) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newlon v. Bennett
369 U.S. 658 (Supreme Court, 1962)