Home/Supreme Court/Torrance v. Callenius

Torrance v. Callenius

369 U.S. 658, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1272
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedMay 14, 1962
Docket227, Misc
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 369 U.S. 658 (Torrance v. Callenius) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Torrance v. Callenius, 369 U.S. 658, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1272 (1962).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis and the petition for writ of certiorari are granted. The judgment is vacated and the case is remanded for consideration in light of Goldlawr, Inc., v. Heiman, ante, p. 463.

Mr. Justice Harlan and Mr. Justice Stewart, for the reasons given in their dissent in the Goldlawr case, would deny certiorari. Mr. Justice Frankfurter took no part in the consideration or decision of this case.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Newlon v. Bennett
369 U.S. 658 (Supreme Court, 1962)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
369 U.S. 658, 82 S. Ct. 1036, 8 L. Ed. 2d 273, 1962 U.S. LEXIS 1272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torrance-v-callenius-scotus-1962.