Torrance v. Betsy

30 Miss. 129
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 15, 1855
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 30 Miss. 129 (Torrance v. Betsy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Torrance v. Betsy, 30 Miss. 129 (Mich. 1855).

Opinion

Peb, cubiam.

The court below erred in rejecting the deed offered in evidence by the defendant on the trial. A plaintiff in ejectment, or in a proceeding to recover land, under the late Pleading Act, must, in order to recover, have the title to the land at the trial; otherwise, if a recovery be had at all, it will be only for the purpose of carrying the costs and giving the party damages for the time he is illegally kept out of possession. If judgment be entered in such case for the land, it will be with a perpetual stay of execution.

Under any view of the law, therefore, the deed was improperly ruled out: the motion to dismiss is not on the record. It is true, [133]*133tbe letter is copied by tbe clerk, but it is not in tbe bill of exceptions.

Judgment reversed, and venire de novo awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Littelle v. Creek Lumber Co.
54 So. 841 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1911)
Gibbs v. McGuire
70 Miss. 646 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1893)
Ex parte Sayre
69 Ala. 184 (Supreme Court of Alabama, 1881)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
30 Miss. 129, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torrance-v-betsy-miss-1855.