Torrance v. Bealer

Ohio Supreme Court

Torrance v. Bealer

915 N.E.2d 659, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1435

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided October 26, 2009·No. 2009-1497·Published

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On S.Ct.Prac.R.X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to declare relator a vexatious litigator, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and Saint Torrance is found to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. XPV(5)(B). Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court that Saint Torrance is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be submitted to the Clerk of this court for the court’s review.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On S.Ct.Prac.R.X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to declare relator a vexatious litigator, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and Saint Torrance is found to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. XPV(5)(B). Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court that Saint Torrance is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be submitted to the Clerk of this court for the court’s review.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Torrance v. Bealer, 915 N.E.2d 659, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1435 (Ohio 2009).

Pincite

915 N.E.2d 659 (Torrance v. Bealer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.