Home/Ohio Supreme Court/Torrance v. Bealer

Torrance v. Bealer

915 N.E.2d 659, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1435
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 26, 2009
Docket2009-1497
StatusPublished

This text of 915 N.E.2d 659 (Torrance v. Bealer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Torrance v. Bealer, 915 N.E.2d 659, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1435 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

In Mandamus and Prohibition. On S.Ct.Prac.R.X(5) determination, cause dismissed.

Upon consideration of respondents’ motion to declare relator a vexatious litigator, it is ordered by the court that the motion is granted, and Saint Torrance is found to be a vexatious litigator under S.Ct.Prac.R. XPV(5)(B). Accordingly,

It is ordered by the court that Saint Torrance is prohibited from continuing or instituting legal proceedings in this court without first obtaining leave. Any request for leave shall be submitted to the Clerk of this court for the court’s review.

Moyer, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, Lanzinger, and Cupp, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
915 N.E.2d 659, 123 Ohio St. 3d 1435, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torrance-v-bealer-ohio-2009.