Torr v. State
This text of 144 So. 839 (Torr v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Even if the information herein charges an offense under the statute when the essential language of the statute or its equivalent is not used in the information, the judgment of conviction of larceny of an automobile is predicated upon evidence that does not show a taking with felonious intent; and a new trial should have been granted. See Percifield v. State, 93 Fla. 247, 111 So. 379; Dean v. State, 41 Fla. 291, 26 So. 628; Cooper vs. State, 82 Fla. 365, 90 So. 375.
Eeversed.
Filed under Eule 21-A.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
144 So. 839, 107 Fla. 382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torr-v-state-fla-1932.