Torphy v. Reder

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Torphy v. Reder

277 N.E.2d 528, 360 Mass. 869

CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

DecidedDecember 31, 1971

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 277 N.E.2d 528 (Torphy v. Reder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torphy v. Reder, 277 N.E.2d 528, 360 Mass. 869 (Mass. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

A Superior Court judge, following the rescript in this matter reported in Torphy v. Reder, 357 Mass. 153, correctly entered a decree after rescript establishing that Reder was indebted to the executor in the sum of 81,512.50, and directing also 'that “an execution is to issue therefor.” See Rule 83 of the Superior Court (1954). See also Boston v. Santosuosso, 308 Mass. 202, 205-206. The decree after rescript is affirmed, with double costs of this frivolous appeal to be paid by the defendant.

So ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

A Superior Court judge, following the rescript in this matter reported in Torphy v. Reder, 357 Mass. 153, correctly entered a decree after rescript establishing that Reder was indebted to the executor in the sum of 81,512.50, and directing also 'that “an execution is to issue therefor.” See Rule 83 of the Superior Court (1954). See also Boston v. Santosuosso, 308 Mass. 202, 205-206. The decree after rescript is affirmed, with double costs of this frivolous appeal to be paid by the defendant.

So ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

277 N.E.2d 528, 360 Mass. 869, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torphy-v-reder-mass-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack