Torosyan v. Ashcroft
This text of 97 F. App'x 137 (Torosyan v. Ashcroft) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Vrezh Torosyan, a native of Iran and citizen of Armenia, petitions pro se for review of the decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) summarily affirming the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We dismiss the petition for review.
We lack jurisdiction to review the IJ’s determination that no extraordinary circumstances excused Torosyan’s untimely filing of his asylum application. See Molina-Estrada v. INS, 293 F.3d 1089, 1093 (9th Cir.2002) (citing 8 U.S.C. § 1158(a)(3)).
Because Torosyan failed to address in his brief to this court how the IJ erred by denying his claims for withholding of removal and CAT relief, he has waived any challenge to these issues. See Martinez-Serrano v. INS, 94 F.3d 1256, 1260 (9th Cir.1996).
PETITION FOR REVIEW DISMISSED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
97 F. App'x 137, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torosyan-v-ashcroft-ca9-2004.