Toro v. State
676 So. 2d 39, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6777, 1996 WL 346983
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 26, 1996·No. No. 95-3417·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We affirm on the authority of Meader v. State, 665 So.2d 344 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995), Helton v. State, 611 So.2d 1323 (Fla. 1st DCA 1993), and Silva v. State, 602 So.2d 694 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992). We acknowledge conflict with Warrington v. State, 660 So.2d 385 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Toro v. State, 676 So. 2d 39, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6777, 1996 WL 346983 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).
676 So. 2d 39 (Toro v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Collins v. State
697 So. 2d 1305 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1997)