Toro v. Richford

259 A.2d 416, 106 R.I. 822, 1969 R.I. LEXIS 701
CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island
DecidedDecember 11, 1969
DocketM. P. No. 655
StatusPublished

This text of 259 A.2d 416 (Toro v. Richford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toro v. Richford, 259 A.2d 416, 106 R.I. 822, 1969 R.I. LEXIS 701 (R.I. 1969).

Opinion

Heard on petition of Helen Bailey to have order of Superior Court adding her as a party defendant quashed. Counsel for all parties were present in court and all stated they would have [823]*823no objection to dropping Helen Bailey as a party defendant. Ordered that order of Superior Court adding Helen Bailey as a party defendant be quashed and she is dropped as a party defendant.

Toro & Crouchley, Eugene F. Toro, Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury & Parsons, for plaintiffs. Robert W. Lovegreen, for Third-Party Plaintiff and Defendant. Francis V. Reynolds, for Helen Bailey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
259 A.2d 416, 106 R.I. 822, 1969 R.I. LEXIS 701, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toro-v-richford-ri-1969.