Toro v. Richford

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Toro v. Richford

259 A.2d 416, 106 R.I. 822, 1969 R.I. LEXIS 701

Supreme Court of Rhode Island·Decided December 11, 1969·No. M. P. No. 655·Published

Opinion

Heard on petition of Helen Bailey to have order of Superior Court adding her as a party defendant quashed. Counsel for all parties were present in court and all stated they would have [823]*823no objection to dropping Helen Bailey as a party defendant. Ordered that order of Superior Court adding Helen Bailey as a party defendant be quashed and she is dropped as a party defendant.

Toro & Crouchley, Eugene F. Toro, Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury & Parsons, for plaintiffs. Robert W. Lovegreen, for Third-Party Plaintiff and Defendant. Francis V. Reynolds, for Helen Bailey.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Heard on petition of Helen Bailey to have order of Superior Court adding her as a party defendant quashed. Counsel for all parties were present in court and all stated they would have [823]*823no objection to dropping Helen Bailey as a party defendant. Ordered that order of Superior Court adding Helen Bailey as a party defendant be quashed and she is dropped as a party defendant.

Toro & Crouchley, Eugene F. Toro, Hinckley, Allen, Salisbury & Parsons, for plaintiffs. Robert W. Lovegreen, for Third-Party Plaintiff and Defendant. Francis V. Reynolds, for Helen Bailey.

Toro v. Richford, 259 A.2d 416, 106 R.I. 822, 1969 R.I. LEXIS 701 (R.I. 1969).

Pincite

259 A.2d 416 (Toro v. Richford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.