Toro v. Depository Trust Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Toro v. Depository Trust Co.

223 A.D.2d 489, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14352

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 25, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 223 A.D.2d 489 (Toro v. Depository Trust Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toro v. Depository Trust Co., 223 A.D.2d 489, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J.), entered on or about November 14, 1994, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul the determination of the New York City Commission on Human Rights, dated September, 1994, that petitioner was not discriminated against by respondents Depository Trust Company, Stuart Fishbein and Lori Klebous-Zivny in violation of, inter alia, Administrative Code of the City of New York § 8-107 (1) (a), granted respondents’ cross motion to confirm the determination, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly found that the Commission’s determination that respondents did not discriminate against petitioner was supported by substantial evidence (Administrative Code § 8-123 [e]). Accordingly, the cross motion to confirm the Commission’s determination was properly granted. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (William Davis, J.), entered on or about November 14, 1994, which denied petitioner’s application pursuant to CPLR article 78 seeking to annul the determination of the New York City Commission on Human Rights, dated September, 1994, that petitioner was not discriminated against by respondents Depository Trust Company, Stuart Fishbein and Lori Klebous-Zivny in violation of, inter alia, Administrative Code of the City of New York § 8-107 (1) (a), granted respondents’ cross motion to confirm the determination, and dismissed the petition, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The IAS Court properly found that the Commission’s determination that respondents did not discriminate against petitioner was supported by substantial evidence (Administrative Code § 8-123 [e]). Accordingly, the cross motion to confirm the Commission’s determination was properly granted. Concur—Rosenberger, J. P., Nardelli, Williams, Tom and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

223 A.D.2d 489, 636 N.Y.S.2d 1010, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 14352, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toro-v-depository-trust-co-nyappdiv-1996.