Tornroos v. Denny's, Inc.
This text of 673 So. 2d 192 (Tornroos v. Denny's, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff Maria Elisabet Tornroos, n/k/a Maria Black has appealed a final summary judgment in a negligent supervision and negligent retention ease against Denny’s, Inc.
Our review of the record shows that there are no genuine issues of material fact as to the claim of negligent retention and that the trial court correctly granted summary judgment thereon. Our review, however, also leads us to the conclusion that there are genuine issues of material fact as to the claim of negligent supervision and thus the summary judgment was improvidently granted as to it. See Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966); Medina v. Metro Dade Police-Police Athletic League, 631 So.2d 1144 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Butler v. Small Fry, Inc., 610 So.2d 54 (Fla. 3d DCA 1992); Smith v. Smith, 413 So.2d 73 (Fla. 1st DCA 1982).
Accordingly, we reverse the summary judgment as to the claim of negligent supervision and remand for further proceedings thereon. The final summary judgment is otherwise affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
673 So. 2d 192, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 5108, 1996 WL 253078, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tornroos-v-dennys-inc-fladistctapp-1996.