Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Tornabene v. Glorioso

Tornabene v. Glorioso

110 A.D.2d 631, 487 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48531
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 1, 1985
StatusPublished

This text of 110 A.D.2d 631 (Tornabene v. Glorioso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tornabene v. Glorioso, 110 A.D.2d 631, 487 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48531 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Opinion

Upon examining all of the proof adduced at the trial, including the incredible testimony of plaintiff’s son that he could not photograph the dangerous condition of the steps within hours after the accident because the condition, created by an extremely prolonged period of neglect, had been remedied within those few hours, we find that the verdict was contrary to the weight of the credible evidence (see, Cohen v Hallmark Cards, 45 NY2d 493; Oleksik v Jones, 41 AD2d 692). Thompson, J. P., Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.
382 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 1978)
Oleksik v. Jones
41 A.D.2d 692 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
110 A.D.2d 631, 487 N.Y.S.2d 120, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48531, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tornabene-v-glorioso-nyappdiv-1985.