Torme C Findley v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation

Michigan Supreme Court

Torme C Findley v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation

DecidedFebruary 2, 2011

Docket141858

StatusPublished

This text of Torme C Findley v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation (Torme C Findley v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torme C Findley v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation, (Mich. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 2, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

141858 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly TORME C. FINDLEY, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 141858 COA: 291402 WCAC: 08-000112 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, n/k/a CHRYSLER GROUP L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission is required to render a majority opinion in order to provide a final decision that is reviewable by the appellate courts.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 2, 2011 _________________________________________ 0126 Clerk

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order Michigan Supreme Court Lansing, Michigan

February 2, 2011 Robert P. Young, Jr., Chief Justice

141858 Michael F. Cavanagh Marilyn Kelly Stephen J. Markman Diane M. Hathaway Mary Beth Kelly TORME C. FINDLEY, Brian K. Zahra, Plaintiff-Appellee, Justices

v SC: 141858 COA: 291402 WCAC: 08-000112 DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION, n/k/a CHRYSLER GROUP L.L.C., Defendant-Appellant.

_________________________________________/

On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the August 24, 2010 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered. We direct the Clerk to schedule oral argument on whether to grant the application or take other peremptory action. MCR 7.302(H)(1). The parties shall submit supplemental briefs within 42 days of the date of this order addressing whether the Workers’ Compensation Appellate Commission is required to render a majority opinion in order to provide a final decision that is reviewable by the appellate courts.

I, Corbin R. Davis, Clerk of the Michigan Supreme Court, certify that the foregoing is a true and complete copy of the order entered at the direction of the Court. February 2, 2011 _________________________________________ 0126 Clerk

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Torme C Findley v. Daimlerchrysler Corporation, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torme-c-findley-v-daimlerchrysler-corporation-mich-2011.