Torjman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MIREILLE TORJMAN,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 10-1031 (JDB) FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
This matter is before the Court on its initial review of plaintiff’s pro se complaint.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e), the Court is required to dismiss a complaint, "[n]otwithstanding
any filing fee," upon a determination that it is "frivolous or malicious" or "fails to state a claim on
which relief may be granted." 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B). Plaintiff Mireille Torjman alleges that
the United States government is using various forms of "mind control" on her, including
"synthetic telepathy," "psychotronics," and other forms of surveillance, and seeks unspecified
damages and injunctive relief against several federal agencies. Compl. at 1-20. Complaints that
describe fantastic or delusional scenarios or contain "fanciful factual allegation[s]" are subject to
dismissal under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Neitzke v. Williams, 490 U.S. 319, 325 (1989); accord
Ruston v. Bush, 298 Fed. App'x 16, 17 (D.C. Cir. 2008); Best v. Kelly, 39 F.3d 328, 330-31
(D.C. Cir. 1994). This complaint qualifies for such treatment and, thus, is dismissed. A separate
Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
/s/ JOHN D. BATES United States District Judge Date: June 21, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Torjman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation (Torjman v. Federal Bureau of Investigation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.