Torisco v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Torisco v. Lehigh Valley Railroad

195 A.D. 915

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1921

StatusPublished

This text of 195 A.D. 915 (Torisco v. Lehigh Valley Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torisco v. Lehigh Valley Railroad, 195 A.D. 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the authority of Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Co. v. Winters (242 U. S. 353); Gallagher v. New York Central R. R. Co. (180 App. Div. 88; affd., 222 N. Y. 649) and Matter of Parsons v. Delaware & Hudson Co. (167 App. Div. 536). All concur. As the evidence stood it was error to refuse to consider the Pennsylvania Employers’ Liability Law.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the authority of Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Co. v. Winters (242 U. S. 353); Gallagher v. New York Central R. R. Co. (180 App. Div. 88; affd., 222 N. Y. 649) and Matter of Parsons v. Delaware & Hudson Co. (167 App. Div. 536). All concur. As the evidence stood it was error to refuse to consider the Pennsylvania Employers’ Liability Law.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

195 A.D. 915, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torisco-v-lehigh-valley-railroad-nyappdiv-1921.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack