Torisco v. Lehigh Valley Railroad
195 A.D. 915
Opinion
Judgment and order reversed and new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the authority of Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad Co. v. Winters (242 U. S. 353); Gallagher v. New York Central R. R. Co. (180 App. Div. 88; affd., 222 N. Y. 649) and Matter of Parsons v. Delaware & Hudson Co. (167 App. Div. 536). All concur. As the evidence stood it was error to refuse to consider the Pennsylvania Employers’ Liability Law.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Torisco v. Lehigh Valley Railroad, 195 A.D. 915 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1921).
195 A.D. 915 (Torisco v. Lehigh Valley Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Minneapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. Winters
242 U.S. 353 (Supreme Court, 1917)
Matter of Gallagher v. . the New York Central Rd. Co.
119 N.E. 1044 (New York Court of Appeals, 1918)
Claim of Parsons v. Delaware & Hudson Co.
167 A.D. 536 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1915)
Claim of Gallagher v. New York Central Railroad
180 A.D. 88 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)