Torgersen v. Torgersen

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Torgersen v. Torgersen

565 So. 2d 903, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6412, 1990 WL 120781

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedAugust 23, 1990

DocketNo. 89-2102

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 565 So. 2d 903 (Torgersen v. Torgersen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Torgersen v. Torgersen, 565 So. 2d 903, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6412, 1990 WL 120781 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

HARRIS, Judge.

Appellant appeals an oral order denying his motion for modification of final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Rule 9.110(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, provides that this court's jurisdiction is invoked by the filing of a notice of appeal within 30 days of the rendition of the [904]*904order to be reviewed. Rule 9.020(g) defines rendition as the filing of a signed, written order with the clerk of the lower tribunal. See also State ex rel. Faircloth v. Cross, 238 So.2d 81 (Fla.1970). An oral pronouncement does not satisfy Rule 9.110(b). See also State v. Green, 527 So.2d 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Since this court is without jurisdiction to review an oral order, this appeal must be dismissed. State v. Smith, 557 So.2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

DISMISS.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

HARRIS, Judge.

Appellant appeals an oral order denying his motion for modification of final judgment of dissolution of marriage. Rule 9.110(b), Florida Rules of Appellate Procedure, provides that this court's jurisdiction is invoked by the filing of a notice of appeal within 30 days of the rendition of the [904]*904order to be reviewed. Rule 9.020(g) defines rendition as the filing of a signed, written order with the clerk of the lower tribunal. See also State ex rel. Faircloth v. Cross, 238 So.2d 81 (Fla.1970). An oral pronouncement does not satisfy Rule 9.110(b). See also State v. Green, 527 So.2d 941 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988).

Since this court is without jurisdiction to review an oral order, this appeal must be dismissed. State v. Smith, 557 So.2d 904 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990).

DISMISS.

DAUKSCH and COWART, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

565 So. 2d 903, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 6412, 1990 WL 120781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torgersen-v-torgersen-fladistctapp-1990.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack