Home/Supreme Court of Pennsylvania/Torchia v. Torchia

Torchia v. Torchia

330 A.2d 853, 459 Pa. 587
CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania
DecidedJanuary 27, 1975
DocketAppeal No. 30
StatusPublished

This text of 330 A.2d 853 (Torchia v. Torchia) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Torchia v. Torchia, 330 A.2d 853, 459 Pa. 587 (Pa. 1975).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Decree affirmed. Costs to be borne by appellant.

MANDERINO, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case. EAGEN and ROBERTS, JJ., filed a concurring opinion. JONES, C. J., dissents. EAGEN and ROBERTS, JJ., join the affirmance of the decree with the understanding that appellant is not foreclosed from pursuing his visitation rights under the contract.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
330 A.2d 853, 459 Pa. 587, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/torchia-v-torchia-pa-1975.