Toral v. Toral
This text of 79 So. 3d 153 (Toral v. Toral) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We affirm the trial court’s final judgment of dissolution which determined that certain funds were marital property. Here, the husband did not only commingle the funds, but he also agreed to transfer the entire account to the wife’s mother to earn a higher interest rate. See Hay v. Hay, 944 So.2d 1043, 1046 (Fla. 4th DCA 2006) (“The trial court is the judge of the facts and the credibility of the witnesses. We cannot conclude that the trial court abused its discretion in determining that the husband failed to carry his burden of proving no gift was intended.” (internal citations omitted)).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
79 So. 3d 153, 2012 WL 280387, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 1336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toral-v-toral-fladistctapp-2012.