Topsnik v. United States
This text of Topsnik v. United States (Topsnik v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This disposition is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit ______________________
GERD TOPSNIK, Plaintiff-Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee ______________________
2016-2405 ______________________
Appeal from the United States Court of Federal Claims in No. 1:14-cv-00275-EDK, Judge Elaine Kaplan. ______________________
JUDGMENT ______________________
CHARLES H. MAGNUSON, Law Offices of Charles Mag- nuson, Los Angeles, CA, argued for plaintiff-appellant.
ANTHONY T. SHEEHAN, Tax Division, United States Department of Justice, Washington, DC, argued for defendant-appellee. Also represented by RICHARD FARBER, CAROLINE D. CIRAOLO. ______________________
THIS CAUSE having been heard and considered, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED:
PER CURIAM (DYK, BRYSON, and CHEN, Circuit Judg- es). AFFIRMED. See Fed. Cir. R. 36.
ENTERED BY ORDER OF THE COURT
May 5, 2017 /s/ Peter R. Marksteiner Date Peter R. Marksteiner Clerk of Court
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Topsnik v. United States, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/topsnik-v-united-states-cafc-2017.