Topper v. Mutual Life Insurance
This text of 389 N.E.2d 142 (Topper v. Mutual Life Insurance) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 932). In addition, the record does not support the contention that respondent made misleading representations to appellant regarding her entitlement to receive benefits under the salary continuation plan.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
389 N.E.2d 142, 46 N.Y.2d 974, 415 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1892, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/topper-v-mutual-life-insurance-ny-1979.