Topper v. Mutual Life Insurance
389 N.E.2d 142, 46 N.Y.2d 974, 415 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1892
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed, with costs, for the reasons stated in the memorandum at the Appellate Division (62 AD2d 932). In addition, the record does not support the contention that respondent made misleading representations to appellant regarding her entitlement to receive benefits under the salary continuation plan.
Concur: Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Gabrielli, Jones, Wachtler and Fuchsberg.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Topper v. Mutual Life Insurance, 389 N.E.2d 142, 46 N.Y.2d 974, 415 N.Y.S.2d 829, 1979 N.Y. LEXIS 1892 (N.Y. 1979).
389 N.E.2d 142 (Topper v. Mutual Life Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hardy v. Rose
60 A.D.3d 904 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Kuhn v. Kuhn
134 A.D.2d 900 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)