Toplitz v. Mendel

City of New York Municipal Court

Toplitz v. Mendel

57 N.Y.S. 1149

DecidedApril 13, 1899

StatusPublished

This text of 57 N.Y.S. 1149 (Toplitz v. Mendel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering City of New York Municipal Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toplitz v. Mendel, 57 N.Y.S. 1149 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1899).

Pincite

Opinion

McOARTHY, J.

The answer denies a material allegation of the complaint, thereby raising an apparent issue as to the alleged excess of rent, to wit $6, and to that extent might be held good. But the fact that tender of the principal sum was not properly made nor pleaded so weighs down the slight advantage obtained in this review that we think the order appealed from is right and proper. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements of appeal.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McOARTHY, J.

The answer denies a material allegation of the complaint, thereby raising an apparent issue as to the alleged excess of rent, to wit $6, and to that extent might be held good. But the fact that tender of the principal sum was not properly made nor pleaded so weighs down the slight advantage obtained in this review that we think the order appealed from is right and proper. Order affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements of appeal.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

57 N.Y.S. 1149, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toplitz-v-mendel-nynyccityct-1899.