Top Hat Maintenance, Inc. v. Zip Maintenance Corp.
This text of 175 A.D.2d 679 (Top Hat Maintenance, Inc. v. Zip Maintenance Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: We affirm the judgment for reasons stated in the decision of Supreme Court (Balbach, J.H.O.). We add only that defendants stipulated to plaintiffs theory of damages (entitlement to the return of the purchase price) and, therefore, defendants are precluded from arguing on appeal that such theory is not cognizable under law (see, Freidus v Eisenberg, 71 NY2d 981, 982). (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Suffolk County, Balbach, J.H.O.— Fraud.) Present — Dillon, P. J., Doerr, Boomer, Pine and Law-ton, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
175 A.D.2d 679, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/top-hat-maintenance-inc-v-zip-maintenance-corp-nyappdiv-1991.