Tootle v. State
This text of 123 So. 922 (Tootle v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The transcript of the record in this case does not contain any judgment of conviction. What appears to have been considered as such a judgment is nothing more than the sentence of the court. There is no adjudication by the court of the guilt of the defendant, of the *470 crime for which the plaintiff in error was convicted by the jury in the trial court. There is, therefore, no such final judgment as will support a writ of error. See Maniscalco v. State, decided at the present time, and cases therein cited. The writ of error must, therefore, be quashed and the cause remanded. It is so ordered.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
123 So. 922, 98 Fla. 469, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tootle-v-state-fla-1929.