Toon v. Finney
This text of 74 Ala. 343 (Toon v. Finney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Alabama primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
— The present case seems to have been submitted to the chancellor, and decided by him, upon the pleadmgs and proof , the proof consisting of a very large number of depositions. These depositions have all been omitted from the record, and in their absence we are bound to presume [344]*344in favor of the correctness of the chancellor’s decree dismissing the bill. The presumption is, that the allegations of the appellant’s bill were not sustained by the proof; and the decree is accordingly affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
74 Ala. 343, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toon-v-finney-ala-1883.