Toomey v. Ocean Park Building Corp.

6 A.D.2d 723, 175 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5775

This text of 6 A.D.2d 723 (Toomey v. Ocean Park Building Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toomey v. Ocean Park Building Corp., 6 A.D.2d 723, 175 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5775 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).

Opinion

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries and for medical expenses and loss of services, the appeal is from an order granting respondents’ motion to vacate appellants’ notice to examine before trial, as an adverse party, respondent Ocean Park Development Corp. by three of its named employees, and to examine as witnesses said employees. Order modified (1) by striking from the first ordering paragraph the words “in all respects granted” and by substituting therefor the words “granted insofar as further examination is sought of defendant Ocean Park Development Corp. through three named employees, and denied insofar as examination is sought of said employees as witnesses ”, and (2) by striking from the second ordering paragraph the word “vacated” and by substituting therefor the words “amended accordingly.” As so modified, order affirmed, without costs; examination to proceed on five days’ notice. While the denial of a further examination of respondent Ocean Park Development Corp., as a party through three named employees thereof, was proper, within the discretion of the Special Term (cf. Tenenbaum v. Hartford Fire Ins. Co., 231 App. Div. 873; Matter of Phillips, 76 N. Y. S. 2d 922), special circumstances were shown entitling appellants to examine the said three employees as witnesses (Kraushaar v. Gross, 270 App. Div. 953; Cataldo v. Long Is. R. R. Co., 268 App, Div. 1054; Zirn v. Bradley, 257 App. Div. 832; Crellin v. Van Duzer, 267 App. Div. 744; Hartmann v. Cahn, 84 N. Y. S. 2d 334). Rolan, P. J., Wenzel, Murphy, Hallinan and Kleinfeld, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tenenbaum v. Hartford Fire Insurance
231 A.D. 873 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1930)
Zirn v. Bradley
257 A.D. 832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1939)
Crellin v. Van Duzer
267 A.D. 744 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1944)
Kraushaar v. Gross
270 A.D. 953 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1946)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 A.D.2d 723, 175 N.Y.S.2d 545, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5775, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toomey-v-ocean-park-building-corp-nyappdiv-1958.