Toomey Bros. v. Citizens & Southern Bank
This text of 91 S.E. 339 (Toomey Bros. v. Citizens & Southern Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
On December 2, 1913, a bank borrowed a sum of money from the plaintiff bank, payable thirty days after date, and gave to the lending bank, as collateral security, customers’ notes, in which was included a note made by the defendant in this case. The borrowing bank was closed as insolvent on the following 13th day of December. In the facts and circumstances in the record there is nothing that would impute to the lending bank knowledge that such a transaction was had pending or in contemplation of insolvency. The positive testimony of the acting officials of the lending bank shows that it had no intimation of such condition. The provisions of the Civil Code of 1910, § 2360, which prohibits all conveyances and assignments by a bank in contemplation of insolvency or after insolvency, except for the benefit of all creditors and stockholders, is intended to prevent preferences for an antecedent debt, and has no application against an innocent assignee for value, without knowledge of such condition of the bank. Booth v. Atlanta Clearing House, 132 Ga. 100 (63 S. E. 907); Hightower v. • Mustian, 8 Ga. 506; Clarice v. Ingram, 107 Ga. 565, 576 (33 S. E. 802).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
91 S.E. 339, 19 Ga. App. 271, 1917 Ga. App. LEXIS 97, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toomey-bros-v-citizens-southern-bank-gactapp-1917.