Toomer v. Saul
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
MIRLIN T., ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) V. ) Civil Case No.
) 1:20-cv-960 (RJL-GMH) KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 4, 2022) [Dkts. ##9, 10]
On August 24, 2021, Magistrate Judge G. Michael Harvey’s [15] Report and Recommendation was entered. The parties then had 14 days to file objections to the recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. Local Civil Rule 72.3(b). No objections have been filed as of this date. Upon careful consideration of the record in this case and of Magistrate Judge Harvey’s [15] Report and Recommendation, the Court ADOPTS and ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation in full.
Accordingly, the Court shall GRANT IN PART plaintiffs [9] Motion for Judgment of Reversal to the extent that it seeks remand to the Social Security Administration for further administrative proceedings and DENY IN PART plaintiff's motion to the extent that it seeks reversal. The Court shall DENY defendant’s [10] Motion for Judgment of Affirmance. The Court further REMANDS this action to
the Commissioner for further proceedings consistent with this opinion and the adopted Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge Harvey.
An appropriate Order accompanies this Memorandum Opinion.
RICHARD J. (EQN United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Toomer v. Saul (Toomer v. Saul) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.