Tooley v. State
This text of 235 A.D. 656 (Tooley v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Judgment affirmed, without costs of this appeal to either party. We think the question of contributory negligence was one of fact because the deceased was acting under the direction of his employer and might, therefore, rely upon the latter’s watchfulness. All concur, except Sears, P. J., and Edgeomb, J., who dissent and vote for reversal on the law and facts and for dismissal of the claim on the ground that the refusal to find defendant’s requests Nos. 9 and 10 was contrary to and against the weight of the evidence. Present ■— Sears, P. J., Crouch, Edgeomb, Thompson and Crosby, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
235 A.D. 656, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tooley-v-state-nyappdiv-1932.