Tooles v. Gallo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Tooles v. Gallo

244 A.D.2d 958, 668 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12351

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 19, 1997·Published

Opinion

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to appear for an orthopedic examination. The motion was made after the filing of a note of issue and statement of readiness, and defendant failed to demonstrate “special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances warranting further discovery” (Peterson v Zuercher, 198 AD2d 797; see, Stella v Ahmed, 223 AD2d 698; Strauss v New York Ethical Culture Socy., 210 AD2d 134). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J.—Discovery.) Present—Denman, P. J., Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Order unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Supreme Court properly denied defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff to appear for an orthopedic examination. The motion was made after the filing of a note of issue and statement of readiness, and defendant failed to demonstrate “special, unusual or extraordinary circumstances warranting further discovery” (Peterson v Zuercher, 198 AD2d 797; see, Stella v Ahmed, 223 AD2d 698; Strauss v New York Ethical Culture Socy., 210 AD2d 134). (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Glownia, J.—Discovery.) Present—Denman, P. J., Hayes, Callahan and Fallon, JJ.

Tooles v. Gallo, 244 A.D.2d 958, 668 N.Y.S.2d 136, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12351 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

244 A.D.2d 958 (Tooles v. Gallo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related