Toole v. State

865 So. 2d 629, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1158, 2004 WL 221056
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 6, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-3891
StatusPublished

This text of 865 So. 2d 629 (Toole v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Toole v. State, 865 So. 2d 629, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1158, 2004 WL 221056 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the trial court’s denial of the appellant’s motion to vacate sentence. See Pitts v. State, 855 So.2d 681 (Fla. 1st DCA 2003); State v. Franklin, 836 So.2d 1112 (Fla. 3d DCA 2003). We certify conflict with Taylor v. State, 818 So.2d 544 (Fla. 2d DCA 2002), review dismissed, 821 So.2d 302 (Fla.2002).

AFFIRMED.

BARFIELD, KAHN, and HAWKES, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Taylor v. State
818 So. 2d 544 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
State v. Franklin
836 So. 2d 1112 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Pitts v. State
855 So. 2d 681 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
865 So. 2d 629, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1158, 2004 WL 221056, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toole-v-state-fladistctapp-2004.