Toole v. Gillespie

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Toole v. Gillespie

3 N.J.L. 1001

DecidedFebruary 15, 1813

StatusPublished

This text of 3 N.J.L. 1001 (Toole v. Gillespie) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Toole v. Gillespie, 3 N.J.L. 1001 (N.J. 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

Pennington, J.

— None of the objections in this case, is supported by the record. As to the slate of demand, the plaintiff below, a laborer, charges the defendant, his employer, with 6 months and 8 days servitude, viz: from the 29th November, to the 6th June, at §20 per month, amountingto §125 S3; and then credits him in the following words: received in casli and goods, §61 73, and strikes the balance, making his demand §63 GO. This, in my opinion, is sufficient. The other objections arc wholly without foundation, from any thing that appears on the record. I am, therefore, for affirming the judgment.

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— It is really to be wished, that gentlemen would consider, how far they are justifiable in order to obtain these writs of certiorari, in offering reasons which have no foundation in truth and in fact.

Judgment by all the Court, affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pennington, J.

— None of the objections in this case, is supported by the record. As to the slate of demand, the plaintiff below, a laborer, charges the defendant, his employer, with 6 months and 8 days servitude, viz: from the 29th November, to the 6th June, at §20 per month, amountingto §125 S3; and then credits him in the following words: received in casli and goods, §61 73, and strikes the balance, making his demand §63 GO. This, in my opinion, is sufficient. The other objections arc wholly without foundation, from any thing that appears on the record. I am, therefore, for affirming the judgment.

Kirkpatrick, C. J.

— It is really to be wished, that gentlemen would consider, how far they are justifiable in order to obtain these writs of certiorari, in offering reasons which have no foundation in truth and in fact.

Judgment by all the Court, affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

3 N.J.L. 1001, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toole-v-gillespie-nj-1813.