Toole v. European American Bank
This text of 166 A.D.2d 440 (Toole v. European American Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for breach of an employment contract, the plaintiff appeals from an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Burstein, J.), entered May 31, 1989, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment and dismissed the complaint.
Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed, with costs, for reasons stated by Justice Burstein in her memorandum decision at the Supreme Court (see also, Jagust v Brookhaven Mem. Assn., 150 AD2d 432). Kooper, J. P., Harwood, Balletta and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
166 A.D.2d 440, 561 N.Y.S.2d 144, 1990 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11854, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/toole-v-european-american-bank-nyappdiv-1990.