Tookes v. Dept. Of Veterans Affairs

Opinion

N0'l‘E: This order is nonprecedential United States Court of AppeaIs for the FederaI Circuit EARNEST TOOKES, Claimant-Appellan,t, V. ERIC K. SHINSEKI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, - Respon,den,t-Appellee. 2011-7189 Appea1 from the United States C0urt of Appea1s for Veterans C1aims in case n0. 09-4465, Judge Kenneth B. Kramer. ON MOTION Be-fore LOUR1E, PR0sT, and MO0RE, Cr1rcu,it Judges. PER CURLA.M.

TOOKES V. DVA 2 Earnest Tookes moves for “rehearing with a different panel of judges." We interpret this as a motion for recon- sideration.* Upon consideration thereof, I'r ls ORDERED TrLA'r: The motion is denied. FoR THE CoURT APR l 8 lsi Jan Horbaly ' Date J an Horbaly Clerk oct Earnest Tookes Christopher A. BoWen, Esq. o 525 F"El»’reALsFon u`Sil4%lf'§?§¢.ic1ncun APR 1 8 2012 .IN|lm!|! 113 * lt is the practice of this court to bring a motion for reconsideration to the panel that ruled on the underlying action.