Tooker v. Tooker
This text of 193 A.D.2d 563 (Tooker v. Tooker) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Eve _ Preminger, J.), entered July 9, 1990, which denied defendants’ motion for summary judgment, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
In light of the unresolved factual questions concerning whether Mrs. Alice Bisbane Tooker undertook the duty to provide medical care for Mr. Tooker while he was at home after he was rendered a quadriplegic in an automobile accident and whether she performed said duty negligently, summary judgment was appropriately denied. (See, e.g., Thibault v Franzese, 24 AD2d 903.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Milonas, Kupferman, Ross and Nardelli, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
193 A.D.2d 563, 603 N.Y.S.2d 717, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tooker-v-tooker-nyappdiv-1993.