Tooker v. Maple

115 A. 255, 93 N.J. Eq. 224, 8 Stock. 224, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 284
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 14, 1921·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion filed in the court below by Vice-Chancellor Backes.

For affirmance — Trenci-iard, Parker, Bergen, Minturn, Black, Katzenbact-i, I-Ieppent-ieimer, Gardner — 8. For reversal — Tiie Chief-Justice, Swayze, Kalisci-i, Williams, Van Buskirk — 5.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tooker v. Maple, 115 A. 255, 93 N.J. Eq. 224, 8 Stock. 224, 1921 N.J. LEXIS 284 (N.J. 1921).

115 A. 255 (Tooker v. Maple) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Bank of New York v. United States
526 F.2d 1012 (Third Circuit, 1975)
Woll v. Dugas
250 A.2d 775 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1969)
In Re Estate of Kortvellessy
245 A.2d 757 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1968)
In Re Hand Will
230 A.2d 408 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1967)
Zabotinsky v. Conklin
218 A.2d 422 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1966)
Gromek v. Gidzela
115 A.2d 144 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Sellyei v. Lecso
101 A.2d 26 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Minogue v. Lipman
96 A.2d 426 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1953)
Sommers v. Zuck
50 A.2d 648 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1947)