Tooker v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF SOUTH CAROLINA
Clifton J. Tooker, Jr., ) C/A No. 0:20-3966-PJG ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER v. ) ) Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of the ) Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) )
This matter is before the court on Plaintiff’s motion for attorney’s fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”). (ECF No. 26); see 28 U.S.C. § 2412. The parties filed a joint stipulation on May 11, 2022 notifying the court that the parties have agreed to a compromise settlement in which Defendant agrees to pay Plaintiff $8,200.00 in attorney’s fees. (ECF No. 27.) The court has reviewed the stipulation and finds the compromise settlement reasonable and authorized under applicable law. See Grisbrecht v. Barnhart, 535 U.S. 789, 796 (2002). Accordingly, it is ORDERED that Plaintiff be granted attorney’s fees pursuant to the EAJA in the amount of $8,200.00. EAJA fees awarded by this court belong to Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). In the event Plaintiff has no present debt subject to offset and Plaintiff has executed a proper assignment to Plaintiff’s counsel, Defendant is directed to make the payment due to Plaintiff’s counsel. If Plaintiff has no debt subject to offset and no proper assignment has been made by Plaintiff to counsel, Defendant is directed to make the check due pursuant to this Order payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff’s counsel. IT IS SO ORDERED.
May 11, 2022 Paige J. Ae Columbia, South Carolina UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tooker v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration (Tooker v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.