Tooel v. Commonwealth

General Court of Virginia

Tooel v. Commonwealth

11 Va. 714

DecidedDecember 15, 1841

StatusPublished

This text of 11 Va. 714 (Tooel v. Commonwealth) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering General Court of Virginia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tooel v. Commonwealth, 11 Va. 714 (Va. Super. Ct. 1841).

Pincite

Opinion

*PER CURIAM.

The decision of chief justice Marshall in Aaron

Burr’s case, “that there was no necessity for delivering the jurymen, who had been or should be sworn, into the custody of the marshal, until the whole number had been impaneled and sworn,” 1 Burr’s trial p. 382, and the opinion of this court in Martin’s case, 2 üeigh 745, are decisive authorities against the prisoner’s application.

CLOPTON, J., dissented, upon the authority of M’Caul’s case, 1 Virg. Ca. 271, 303-6.

Writ of error denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*PER CURIAM.

The decision of chief justice Marshall in Aaron

Burr’s case, “that there was no necessity for delivering the jurymen, who had been or should be sworn, into the custody of the marshal, until the whole number had been impaneled and sworn,” 1 Burr’s trial p. 382, and the opinion of this court in Martin’s case, 2 üeigh 745, are decisive authorities against the prisoner’s application.

CLOPTON, J., dissented, upon the authority of M’Caul’s case, 1 Virg. Ca. 271, 303-6.

Writ of error denied.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

11 Va. 714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tooel-v-commonwealth-vagensess-1841.