Tony Register, Individually, as Representative of the Estate of Sheila Register and A/N/F Shelby Register, Krystin Pilsner, Individually and A/N/F to Ashley Kendrick, Mark Pilsner and Mary Woods v. Kurtikumar T. Shah, MD

Court of Appeals of Texas

Tony Register, Individually, as Representative of the Estate of Sheila Register and A/N/F Shelby Register, Krystin Pilsner, Individually and A/N/F to Ashley Kendrick, Mark Pilsner and Mary Woods v. Kurtikumar T. Shah, MD

DecidedMarch 17, 2005

Docket14-04-00502-CV

StatusPublished

This text of Tony Register, Individually, as Representative of the Estate of Sheila Register and A/N/F Shelby Register, Krystin Pilsner, Individually and A/N/F to Ashley Kendrick, Mark Pilsner and Mary Woods v. Kurtikumar T. Shah, MD (Tony Register, Individually, as Representative of the Estate of Sheila Register and A/N/F Shelby Register, Krystin Pilsner, Individually and A/N/F to Ashley Kendrick, Mark Pilsner and Mary Woods v. Kurtikumar T. Shah, MD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tony Register, Individually, as Representative of the Estate of Sheila Register and A/N/F Shelby Register, Krystin Pilsner, Individually and A/N/F to Ashley Kendrick, Mark Pilsner and Mary Woods v. Kurtikumar T. Shah, MD, (Tex. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 17, 2005

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 17, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-04-00502-CV

TONY REGISTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF SHEILA REGISTER AND A/N/F TO SHELBY REGISTER; KRYSTIN PILSNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F TO ASHLEY KENDRICK, MARK PILSNER AND MARY WOODS, Appellants

V.

KURTIKUMAR T. SHAH, M.D., Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 03-30413A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 30, 2004. The clerk=s record was filed on July 6, 2004. Appellants= brief was not timely filed. This court ordered appellants to file their brief on or before January 11, 2005, or the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. On appellants= request, we granted an extension of time to file the brief until thirty days after a supplemental clerk=s record was filed. The First Supplemental Clerk=s record was filed December 14, 2004. No further supplementation has been filed. Accordingly, appellants= brief was due on or before January 13, 2005. No brief or further motion for extension of time has been filed.

On February 10, 2005, this court issued an order stating that unless appellants submitted their brief, together with a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late, on or before February 25, 2005, the court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellants filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed March 17, 2005.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Frost.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 17, 2005

Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 17, 2005.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals

____________

NO. 14-04-00502-CV

TONY REGISTER, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF SHEILA REGISTER AND A/N/F TO SHELBY REGISTER; KRYSTIN PILSNER, INDIVIDUALLY AND A/N/F TO ASHLEY KENDRICK, MARK PILSNER AND MARY WOODS, Appellants

V.

KURTIKUMAR T. SHAH, M.D., Appellee

On Appeal from the 157th District Court

Harris County, Texas

Trial Court Cause No. 03-30413A

M E M O R A N D U M O P I N I O N

This is an appeal from a judgment signed January 30, 2004. The clerk=s record was filed on July 6, 2004. Appellants= brief was not timely filed. This court ordered appellants to file their brief on or before January 11, 2005, or the appeal would be dismissed for want of prosecution. On appellants= request, we granted an extension of time to file the brief until thirty days after a supplemental clerk=s record was filed. The First Supplemental Clerk=s record was filed December 14, 2004. No further supplementation has been filed. Accordingly, appellants= brief was due on or before January 13, 2005. No brief or further motion for extension of time has been filed.

On February 10, 2005, this court issued an order stating that unless appellants submitted their brief, together with a motion reasonably explaining why the brief was late, on or before February 25, 2005, the court would dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). Appellants filed no response.

Accordingly, the appeal is ordered dismissed.

PER CURIAM

Judgment rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed March 17, 2005.

Panel consists of Chief Justice Hedges and Justices Fowler and Frost.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Tony Register, Individually, as Representative of the Estate of Sheila Register and A/N/F Shelby Register, Krystin Pilsner, Individually and A/N/F to Ashley Kendrick, Mark Pilsner and Mary Woods v. Kurtikumar T. Shah, MD, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tony-register-individually-as-representative-of-the-estate-of-sheila-texapp-2005.