Tony Navarro v. State of Florida
This text of Tony Navarro v. State of Florida (Tony Navarro v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________
Case No. 6D2024-0701 Lower Tribunal No. 24MM71 _____________________________
TONY NAVARRO,
Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee. _____________________________
Appeal from the County Court for Glades County. Darrell R. Hill, Judge.
April 10, 2026
PER CURIAM.
The judgment and sentence is affirmed without prejudice to the filing of a
motion for postconviction relief under Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850(a),
see Griffin v. State, 10 So. 3d 165, 166 (Fla. 3d DCA 2009) (stating that a claim that
a crime was not actually committed is cognizable under rule 3.850), or a motion to
correct the trial court’s clerical error in its March 8, 2024, sentencing order, see
Rodgers v. State, 934 So. 2d 1207, 1221 (Fla. 2006) (noting that a trial court may
correct clerical errors in its orders at any time). AFFIRMED.
STARGEL, GANNAM and KAMOUTSAS, JJ., concur.
Ita M. Neymotin, Regional Counsel, and Clay W. Oberhausen, Assistant Regional Counsel, of the office of Criminal Conflict and Civil Regional Counsel, Sarasota, and Thomas J. Butler, of the Law office of Thomas Butler, P.A., Miami Beach, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tony Navarro v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tony-navarro-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2026.