Tony Martinez v. State
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
JUDGMENT RENDERED JULY 31, 2013
NO. 03-12-00192-CR
Tony Martinez, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
APPEAL FROM 22ND DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES PURYEAR, PEMBERTON AND ROSE MODIFIED AND, AS MODIFIED, AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE PEMBERTON
THIS CAUSE came on to be heard on the record of the court below, and the same being
considered, because it is the opinion of this Court that there was error in the judgments of
conviction, but that such error does not require the judgment be reversed: IT IS THEREFORE
considered, adjudged and ordered that the judgments of conviction are modified to reflect that
Martinez pleaded “guilty” to each count of the indictment. As so modified, the judgments of
conviction are affirmed. It FURTHER appearing to the Court that the appellant is indigent and
unable to pay costs, that no adjudication as to costs is made; and that this decision be certified
below for observance.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tony Martinez v. State (Tony Martinez v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.