Tony Manuel Campos v. United States

409 F.2d 567, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12886
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedApril 10, 1969
Docket22287_1
StatusPublished

This text of 409 F.2d 567 (Tony Manuel Campos v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tony Manuel Campos v. United States, 409 F.2d 567, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12886 (9th Cir. 1969).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The conviction of Campos for bank robbery is affirmed.

Counsel has done his best for Campos, but he has little grist for an appeal except his client’s desire to appeal.

We reject the contention that it was fundamental error to receive in evidence an exclamation of the fleeing robber which tended a little to establish Campos as the driver of the getaway car. There was other strong evidence that Campos was the driver. The words were not hearsay but the conduct or verbal act of one of two people shown to be acting in concert.

We find no merit in the contentions that a comment made by the judge was improper or that at the close of the case he handled the jury improperly.

The motion for bail and other relief received from appellant on March 10, 1969, is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Gilbert E. Lazaroff
409 F.2d 567 (Second Circuit, 1969)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
409 F.2d 567, 1969 U.S. App. LEXIS 12886, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tony-manuel-campos-v-united-states-ca9-1969.