Tony Griffin v. Kurtis Holcomb
This text of Tony Griffin v. Kurtis Holcomb (Tony Griffin v. Kurtis Holcomb) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________
No. 24-1371 ___________________________
Tony Anthony Griffin
lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellant
v.
Kurtis Holcomb, Officer, Pine Bluff Unit (Originally named Curtis Holcumb)
lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellee ____________
Appeal from United States District Court for the Eastern District of Arkansas - Central ____________
Submitted: October 16, 2024 Filed: October 21, 2024 [Unpublished] ____________
Before LOKEN, SMITH, and KOBES, Circuit Judges. ____________
PER CURIAM.
Arkansas inmate Tony Griffin appeals following the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review,
1 The Honorable Billy Roy Wilson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas, adopting the report and recommendations of the Honorable Patricia S. Harris, United States Magistrate Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas. we agree with the district court that Griffin failed to exhaust his administrative remedies. See King v. Iowa Dep’t of Corr., 598 F.3d 1051, 1052 (8th Cir. 2010) (standard of review). Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Griffin’s motion for appointment of counsel. ______________________________
-2-
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tony Griffin v. Kurtis Holcomb, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tony-griffin-v-kurtis-holcomb-ca8-2024.