Tony Eugene Saffold v. Thomas L. Carey

295 F.3d 1380, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6698, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 8416, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15009, 2002 WL 1728424
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided July 26, 2002·No. 99-15541·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

ORDER

Appellant’s motion for enlargement of time and recall of the mandate is GRANTED IN PART. The mandate of this court that issued on July 9, 2002, is recalled. The order filed by this court on July 8, 2002, is withdrawn and the court sua sponte grants rehearing.

The parties are instructed to file simultaneous briefs addressing the following question: What is the proper disposition to be ordered by this court on remand from the Supreme Court of the United States, in light of the Supreme Court’s opinion, Carey v. Saffold, - U.S. -, 122 S.Ct. 2134, 153 L.Ed.2d 260 (2002)?

The briefs are not to exceed twenty-five (25) double-spaced pages in length, and are to be filed on or before thirty (30) days from the date of filing of this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tony Eugene Saffold v. Thomas L. Carey, 295 F.3d 1380, 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 6698, 2002 Daily Journal DAR 8416, 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 15009, 2002 WL 1728424 (9th Cir. 2002).

295 F.3d 1380 (Tony Eugene Saffold v. Thomas L. Carey) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baker v. Horn
383 F. Supp. 2d 720 (E.D. Pennsylvania, 2005)