TONY ERIC DUPIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA

239 So. 3d 1286
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedApril 4, 2018
Docket16-4413
StatusPublished

This text of 239 So. 3d 1286 (TONY ERIC DUPIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
TONY ERIC DUPIN v. STATE OF FLORIDA, 239 So. 3d 1286 (Fla. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT

TONY ERIC DUPIN, ) ) Appellant, ) ) v. ) Case No. 2D16-4413 ) STATE OF FLORIDA, ) ) Appellee. ) )

Opinion filed April 4, 2018.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Charlotte County; Donald H. Mason, Judge.

Howard L. Dimmig, II, Public Defender, and Ivy R. Ginsberg, Special Assistant Public Defender, Bartow, for Appellant.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Assistant Attorney General, Tampa, for Appellee.

KELLY, Judge.

Tony Eric Dupin appeals from his judgment and sentence for aggravated

battery with a deadly weapon (a knife). He argues that his trial counsel's failure to

object to the absence of a jury instruction on justifiable use of nondeadly force

constituted ineffective assistance of counsel. While it is rare that a claim that defense counsel is ineffective will be considered on direct appeal, a defendant may raise it if the

"ineffectiveness is apparent on the face of the record and it would be a waste of judicial

resources to require the trial court to address the issue." Blanco v. Wainwright, 507 So.

2d 1377, 1384 (Fla. 1987). Counsel's performance in this case meets that standard.

See McComb v. State, 174 So. 3d 1111, 1113 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015) (finding ineffective

assistance of counsel on the face of the record where counsel's failure to request an

instruction on justifiable use of nondeadly force deprived the defendant of a defense);

see also Michel v. State, 989 So. 2d 679, 681 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (same). Accordingly,

we reverse and remand for a new trial.

Reversed and remanded.

CASANUEVA and KHOUZAM, JJ., Concur.

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Blanco v. Wainwright
507 So. 2d 1377 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1987)
Michel v. State
989 So. 2d 679 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)
McComb v. State
174 So. 3d 1111 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 So. 3d 1286, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tony-eric-dupin-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2018.