Tony Dooley v. Cj Johnson Home Improvement & Cornelius Johnson
This text of Tony Dooley v. Cj Johnson Home Improvement & Cornelius Johnson (Tony Dooley v. Cj Johnson Home Improvement & Cornelius Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TONY DOOLEY * NO. 2022-CA-0011
VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL
CJ JOHNSON HOME * FOURTH CIRCUIT IMPROVEMENT & CORNELIUS JOHNSON * STATE OF LOUISIANA
*
* *******
TGC
CHASE, J., CONCURS IN THE RESULT
I concur with the result reached by the majority that this appeal should be
dismissed as untimely. I write separately to note that, based upon the merits of this
appeal, I would have affirmed the trial court’s judgment. “When findings are
based on determinations regarding the credibility of witnesses, the manifest error-
clearly wrong standard demands great deference to the trier of fact’s findings.”
Rosell v. ESCO, 549 So.2d 840, 845-846 (La. 1989). If objective evidence
contradicts the witness’s story, or the story itself is so internally inconsistent or
implausible that a reasonable fact finder would not give it credit, an appellate court
may well find manifest error even in a finding purportedly based upon a credibility
determination. Id. “But where such factors are not present, and a factfinder’s
finding is based upon its decision to credit the testimony of one of two or more
witnesses, that finding can virtually never be manifestly erroneous or clearly
wrong.” Id.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Tony Dooley v. Cj Johnson Home Improvement & Cornelius Johnson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tony-dooley-v-cj-johnson-home-improvement-cornelius-johnson-lactapp-2022.