Tonsfeldt v. Haugen

Missouri Court of Appeals

Tonsfeldt v. Haugen

561 S.W.3d 455

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 23, 2018

DocketWD 81328

StatusPublished

This text of 561 S.W.3d 455 (Tonsfeldt v. Haugen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Tonsfeldt v. Haugen, 561 S.W.3d 455 (Mo. Ct. App. 2018).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Sarah Haugen appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County granting guardianship of her child, R.T., to Roberta Tonsfeldt. She raises nine points of error on appeal, including allegations that the trial court erroneously applied the law and the trial court's judgment was not supported by substantial evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Sarah Haugen appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of Jackson County granting guardianship of her child, R.T., to Roberta Tonsfeldt. She raises nine points of error on appeal, including allegations that the trial court erroneously applied the law and the trial court's judgment was not supported by substantial evidence. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have instead provided a memorandum of law to the parties. Finding no error, we affirm. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 S.W.3d 455, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tonsfeldt-v-haugen-moctapp-2018.