Tonorezos v. County of Nassau

266 A.D.2d 387, 698 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11525
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided November 15, 1999·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiff appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Joseph, J.), entered September 15, 1998, which granted the motion of the defendant Town of North Hempstead for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the motion of the defendant Town of North Hempstead (hereinafter the Town) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against it, since it is undisputed that the required written notice of the defect which allegedly caused the plaintiff’s accident was not given to the Town (see, Town of North Hempstead Code § 26-1). The plaintiffs claim of constructive notice based upon the Town’s inspection and repair of the curb near the location of her accident and approximately two months prior thereto is insufficient to overcome this failure to give written notice (see, Amabile v City of Buffalo, 93 NY2d 471). Altman, J. P., Florio, H. Miller and Schmidt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tonorezos v. County of Nassau, 266 A.D.2d 387, 698 N.Y.S.2d 331, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11525 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 387 (Tonorezos v. County of Nassau) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sommer v. Town of Hempstead
271 A.D.2d 434 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
DeLorm v. Village of Lyons
269 A.D.2d 793 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)