Tonopah Solar Energy, Llc Vs. Brahma Grp., Inc.

470 P.3d 214

• Court: Nevada Supreme Court
• Decided: August 31, 2020
• Docket: 78092
• Status: Published

Opinion

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA

TONOPAH SOLAR ENERGY, LLC, A No, 78092 DELAWARE LIMITED LIABILITY COMPANY, Appellant, vs. BRAHMA GROUP, INC., A NEVADA CORPORATION, FILED Respondent. AUG 3 1 2020 ELIZABETH A. BROWN CLERK OF SUPREME COURT BY 5•Y DEPUSfY 1-4 CLERS

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to expunge a mechanic's lien and awarding fees and costs. Fifth Judicial District Court, Nye County; Steven Elliott, Judge. Appellant has filed a notice of bankruptcy, informing this court that appellant has filed a voluntary petition for Chapter 11 bankruptcy in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. 20-11884 (KBO). The filing of a bankruptcy petition operates to stay, automatically, the "continuation" of any "judicial . . . action . . . against the debtor." 11 U.S.C. § 362(a)(1). An appeal, for purposes of the automatic stay, is considered a continuation of the action in the trial court. Consequently, an appeal is automatically stayed if the debtor was the defendant in the underlying trial court action. See Ingersoll-Rand Fin. Corp. v. Miller Mining Co., Inc., 817 F.2d 1424 (9th Cir. 1987). It appears that appellant was a counter-defendant and defendant-in-intervention in the proceedings SUPREME COURT OF NEVADA

(0) 1947A - 32030 . • . below and challenges an award of attorney fees and costs against it; therefore, this appeal is stayed pursuant to the automatic stay provisions of federal bankruptcy law. Given the applicability of the automatic stay, this appeal may linger indefinitely on this court's docket pending final resolution of the bankruptcy proceedings. Accordingly, this court concludes that judicial effi.ciency will be best served if this appeal is dismissed without prejudice. Because a dismissal without prejudice will not require this court to reach the merits of this appeal and is not inconsistent with the primary purposes of the bankruptcy stay—to provide protection for debtors and creditors— the court further concludes that such dismissal will not violate the bankruptcy stay. See Indep. Union of Flight Attendants v. Pan Arn. World Airways, Inc., 966 F.2d 457, 459 (9th Cir. 1992) (holding that the automatic stay does not preclude dismissal of an appeal so long as dismissal is tCconsistent with the purpose of the statute"); Dean v. Trans World Airlines,

Inc., 72 F.3d 754, 755 (9th Cir. 1995) (holding that a post-bankruptcy petition dismissal will violate the automatic stay "where the decision to dismiss first requires the court to consider other issues presented by or related to the underlying case"). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed. This dismissal is without prejudice to appellant's right to move for reinstatement of this appeal within 90 days of either the lifting of the bankruptcy stay or final resolution

!The automatic stay provides a debtor "with protection against hungry creditors and gives the debtor a "breathing spell from its creditors" by stopping all collection efforts. Dean v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 72 F.3d 754, 755 (9th Cir. 1995). Further, it assures creditors "that the debtor's other creditors are not racing to various courthouses to pursue independent remedies to drain the debtor's assets." Id. at 755-56.

2 : of the bankruptcy proceedings, if appellant deems such a motion appropriate at that time. It is so ORDERED.

Parraguirre

J. Hardesty o

604J J. Cadish

cc: Chief Judge, The Fifth Judicial District Court Hon. Steven Elliott, Senior Judge Lansford W. Levitt, Settlement Judge Weinberg, Wheeler, Hudgins, Gunn & Dial, LLC Peel Brimley LLP/Henderson Nye County Clerk