Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad v. Fellenbaum

35 Nev. 249
Nevada Supreme Court·Decided October 15, 1912·No. No. 1847·Published

Opinion

By the Court,

Talbot, J.:

Upon further consideration, after rehearing, we see no reason for changing the views which we expressed in the original opinion, and we think justice and the law will be best subserved by allowing it to stand. (32 Nev. 278.)

As therein directed, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the case is ordered remanded for a new trial.

Sweeney, C. J.: I concur. Norcross, J.: I dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad v. Fellenbaum, 35 Nev. 249 (Neb. 1912).

35 Nev. 249 (Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad v. Fellenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad v. Fellanbaum
32 Nev. 278 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1910)