Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad v. Fellenbaum

35 Nev. 249
CourtNevada Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 15, 1912
DocketNo. 1847
StatusPublished

This text of 35 Nev. 249 (Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad v. Fellenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Nevada Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad v. Fellenbaum, 35 Nev. 249 (Neb. 1912).

Opinion

By the Court,

Talbot, J.:

Upon further consideration, after rehearing, we see no reason for changing the views which we expressed in the original opinion, and we think justice and the law will be best subserved by allowing it to stand. (32 Nev. 278.)

As therein directed, the judgment of the district court is reversed, and the case is ordered remanded for a new trial.

Sweeney, C. J.: I concur. Norcross, J.: I dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Tonopah & Goldfield Railroad v. Fellanbaum
32 Nev. 278 (Nevada Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
35 Nev. 249, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tonopah-goldfield-railroad-v-fellenbaum-nev-1912.