Tonny President v. State of Florida

166 So. 3d 951, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9250, 2015 WL 3761331
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 17, 2015
Docket4D15-768
StatusPublished

This text of 166 So. 3d 951 (Tonny President v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Tonny President v. State of Florida, 166 So. 3d 951, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9250, 2015 WL 3761331 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the denial of defendant’s motion to clarify his sentence. See, e.g., Hardenbrook v. State, 953 So.2d 717 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007) (“Once the sentencing judge has awarded a defendant prior prison credit, the Department of Corrections has primary responsibility for calculating the credit.”). As to any new claims raised on rehearing, we affirm the denial without prejudice to the defendant’s right to raise them in a legally sufficient, separately-filed motion, in the trial court.

GROSS, CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hardenbrook v. State
953 So. 2d 717 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
166 So. 3d 951, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 9250, 2015 WL 3761331, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tonny-president-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2015.