Tonnelier v. Maurin's Ex'r
2 Mart. 206
Opinion
There being no evidence of the plaintiff having been accounted with, or of any claim of hers in the life time of the testator of the defendant, it must be presumed that the parties had joined their stock for their mutual support. The plaintiff might as well claim wages for her [207] services in the house, or might be sued for her board and that of her children.
Judgment for defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Tonnelier v. Maurin's Ex'r, 2 Mart. 206 (La. Super. Ct. 1812).
2 Mart. 206 (Tonnelier v. Maurin's Ex'r) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.