Tonnelier v. Maurin's Ex'r
This text of 2 Mart. 206 (Tonnelier v. Maurin's Ex'r) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
There being no evidence of the plaintiff having been accounted with, or of any claim of hers in the life time of the testator of the defendant, it must be presumed that the parties had joined their stock for their mutual support. The plaintiff might as well claim wages for her [207]*207services in the house, or might be sued for her board and that of her children.
Judgment for defendant.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2 Mart. 206, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/tonnelier-v-maurins-exr-lasuperct-1812.